ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of Mississippi answer due 8/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/14/2026. (lgm)
Case Summary
ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of Mississippi answer due 8/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/14/2026. (lgm) is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The court granted the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
Latest development
ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of Mississippi answer due 8/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/14/2026. (lgm)
Order · May 15, 2026
The court granted the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of
Order · May 15, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 15, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge Roy Percy granted a motion allowing the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis on May 14, 2026. This order means the plaintiff can file the case without paying court fees upfront, indicating financial hardship. The court also directed the State of Mississippi to file a response by August 11, 2026.
The case remains active but lacks detailed filings or identified parties beyond the State of Mississippi. The court has not yet set a trial date or issued substantive rulings on the merits. The docket number and court are not publicly available, limiting insight into the case's background or claims.
The order to respond suggests the State is the defendant, and the plaintiff has initiated a civil action against it. The case is currently in its early procedural stage, with the next steps hinging on the State's answer. Juryvine will monitor for new filings, attorney appearances, or rulings that clarify the dispute or raise significant legal issues.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of Mississippi answer due 8/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/14/2026. (lgm) is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The court granted the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING the State of Mississippi to Respond, State of Mississippi answer due 8/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/14/2026. (lgm)
The court granted the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.