civil-litigation court-opinion

David Chatman v. Centurion of Minnesota LLC and others: Opinion Issued

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

No summary or docket information is available for this case. The title references an opinion involving David Chatman and Centurion of Minnesota LLC, Paul Schnell, and Lynn Stottler.

Latest development

/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/

Opinion · May 12, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

Key Issues

  • Unavailable case details
  • Opinion referenced
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/

Opinion · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 12, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 2 hours ago

David Chatman sued Centurion of Minnesota LLC, along with Paul Schnell and Lynn Stottler, raising claims that have yet to be fully detailed in the public record. The case remains active, but the court has not assigned a judge or provided a docket number.

On May 12, 2026, the court issued a written opinion, signaling movement but leaving the substance of the ruling unclear. The absence of a docket number and judge assignment suggests the case is still in early stages or pending administrative processing.

The parties involved include a private plaintiff, Chatman, and a corporate defendant, Centurion of Minnesota LLC, with two individual defendants named, indicating potential claims against both the company and its representatives.

The court’s opinion could address preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, standing, or motions to dismiss, but without further filings, the scope remains uncertain. Observers should watch for the assignment of a judge and the filing of a formal docket to clarify the procedural posture.

The case’s progression will depend on forthcoming motions and the court’s handling of initial pleadings. The involvement of individual defendants alongside the corporate entity may complicate discovery and liability questions as the case develops.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
menu_book
Opinion 1 day ago
The court issued a written opinion.
receipt_long Source expand_more

/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion May 12, 2026

/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 18 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.