David Chatman v. Centurion of Minnesota LLC and others: Opinion Issued
Case Summary
No summary or docket information is available for this case. The title references an opinion involving David Chatman and Centurion of Minnesota LLC, Paul Schnell, and Lynn Stottler.
Latest development
/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/
Opinion · May 12, 2026
The court issued a written opinion.
Key Issues
- • Unavailable case details
- • Opinion referenced
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Opinion issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/
Opinion · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
David Chatman sued Centurion of Minnesota LLC, along with Paul Schnell and Lynn Stottler, raising claims that have yet to be fully detailed in the public record. The case remains active, but the court has not assigned a judge or provided a docket number.
On May 12, 2026, the court issued a written opinion, signaling movement but leaving the substance of the ruling unclear. The absence of a docket number and judge assignment suggests the case is still in early stages or pending administrative processing.
The parties involved include a private plaintiff, Chatman, and a corporate defendant, Centurion of Minnesota LLC, with two individual defendants named, indicating potential claims against both the company and its representatives.
The court’s opinion could address preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, standing, or motions to dismiss, but without further filings, the scope remains uncertain. Observers should watch for the assignment of a judge and the filing of a formal docket to clarify the procedural posture.
The case’s progression will depend on forthcoming motions and the court’s handling of initial pleadings. The involvement of individual defendants alongside the corporate entity may complicate discovery and liability questions as the case develops.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 event/opinion/10857365/david-chatman-v-centurion-of-minnesota-llc-paul-schnell-lynn-stottler/
The court issued a written opinion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.