Eleventh Circuit Opinion in Perez v. Krome North
Case Summary
The Eleventh Circuit issued its opinion in Perez v. Krome North, reviewing lower court rulings on immigration detention conditions. The appellate court analyzed constitutional claims and procedural due process.
Latest development
Ismael Perez v. Assistant Field Office Director Krome North Service: Opinion Issued
Opinion · May 6, 2026
The court issued a written opinion.
Key Issues
- • Immigration law
- • Due process
- • Detention conditions
Docket Snapshot
Court
11th Cir.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 11th Circuit
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Opinion issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Ismael Perez v. Assistant Field Office Director Krome North Service: Opinion Issued
Opinion · May 06, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, a federal appeals court.
The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Assistant Field Office Director Krome North Service, Ismael Perez and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Ismael Perez v. Assistant Field Office Director Krome North Service: Opinion Issued
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (11th Cir.) is a federal appellate court in the 11th Circuit.
Case Timeline
1 eventIsmael Perez v. Assistant Field Office Director Krome North Service: Opinion Issued
The court issued a written opinion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 16 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.