/opinion/10852748/people-v-abuharba/
Case Summary
Civil case currently marked active. Latest development: /opinion/10852798/people-v-moss/. Coverage tracked from 5 media sources.
Stage
Opinion issued
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Opinion issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
/opinion/10852798/people-v-moss/
Opinion · May 04, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 04, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 1 distinct source.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10852798/people-v-moss/
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10852778/people-v-torres/
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10852738/people-v-morris/
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10852746/people-v-turner/
receipt_long Source expand_more
/opinion/10852748/people-v-abuharba/
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
5 events/opinion/10852798/people-v-moss/
The court issued a written opinion.
/opinion/10852778/people-v-torres/
The court issued a written opinion.
/opinion/10852738/people-v-morris/
The court issued a written opinion.
/opinion/10852746/people-v-turner/
The court issued a written opinion.
/opinion/10852748/people-v-abuharba/
The court issued a written opinion.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.