legal-news

/opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case currently marked active. Latest development: /opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/.

Latest development

/opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/

Opinion · April 30, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

/opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/

Opinion · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated April 30, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
menu_book
Opinion 6 days ago
The court issued a written opinion.
receipt_long Source expand_more

/opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion April 30, 2026

/opinion/10851336/kathleen-c-v-choi-ca22/

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

6 days, 12 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.