Ramos Injury Firm Sues Estate Representative David Petrushka

A court issued a written opinion on April 20, 2026 in The Ramos Injury Firm, LLC v. David Petrushka, Individually and as Personal Representative. The docket number and court are not yet confirmed in Juryvine's records, but the case is active.

The dispute pits a personal injury law firm against David Petrushka, named both in his individual capacity and as a personal representative — likely of an estate. That dual-capacity naming matters. Claims against Petrushka personally and claims against him as a fiduciary can carry different standards of liability and different exposure.

The core issues are not yet fully detailed in the available record. What is clear is that the firm is the plaintiff, Petrushka is the defendant, and the April 20 opinion is the most recent substantive move on the docket. Whether that opinion resolved the case, disposed of a motion, or addressed a narrower procedural question is not yet confirmed.

The April 20 opinion is the anchor event. Courts issue written opinions at several stages — on motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, post-trial, or on appeal. The outcome turns on which stage produced this opinion.

If it came on a dispositive motion, one side may now be deciding whether to appeal or comply. If it resolved the case entirely, the question shifts to enforcement.

Until the docket number and court are confirmed, the full procedural posture stays murky. The judge is not yet assigned in Juryvine's records, which may reflect a gap in intake rather than the actual court file.