Pro Se Plaintiff Reo Sues Manasseh Jordan Ministries Over Alleged Robocall Violations

A federal court issued a written opinion on April 20, 2026, in Bryan Anthony Reo v. Manasseh Jordan Ministries, Inc., et al. The docket number and court of record have not been confirmed, but the case is active.

Reo is a pro se litigant with a documented history of filing suits against telemarketing and robocall operations. Manasseh Jordan Ministries is a religious broadcasting organization. The dispute almost certainly turns on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which is Reo's preferred vehicle — he has brought dozens of TCPA claims in federal court over unsolicited calls and texts.

The April 20 opinion is the most recent docket event on record. What the court ruled — whether on a dispositive motion, damages, or some procedural question — is not yet confirmed from the available record. The opinion's existence signals the case has reached at least one substantive decision point.

Reo wins some of these cases and loses others. Courts have occasionally found his claims credible on the merits while also scrutinizing whether he manufactured standing by soliciting the very contacts he then sued over. That question — whether a plaintiff who invites calls can still claim TCPA injury — has divided district courts and is worth watching here.

No judge assignment is confirmed in the available data. Until the full opinion text and docket are on hand, the precise outcome of the April 20 ruling remains open.