1:26-cv-22270 Hernandez v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 5
Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al is a civil case. The case is currently assigned to a judge, but the court and judge's name are unknown. The docket number is 26-cv-22102. The case summary is currently limited to the judge assignment. Further information is not available at this time.
Latest development
Order · April 23, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingOrder of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant ( 4
Open original open_in_newto Order to Show Cause ( 10 )
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A new habeas corpus petition was filed in the case of Hernandez v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, case number 1:26-cv-22270. The petition, filed on behalf of the plaintiff, seeks to challenge the detention of the individual at the Krome North Service Processing Center. This development is relevant to the ongoing case of Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al.
A Notice of Compliance was filed.
Judge Alcocer Ayala has been assigned to the case Alcocer Ayala v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, which is related to Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al. This assignment is a procedural step in the case management process. The judge's assignment will impact the direction and pace of the case.
The court issued an order.
The court granted Becker Vives permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee. This decision allows Vives to continue with his case against the Krome North Service Processing Center and its warden. The court's ruling is significant because it enables Vives to pursue his claims without financial burden.
The court has consolidated a new case, Victoria Gerena v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, with the existing case Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al. This consolidation will allow the court to manage related cases together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may impact the overall outcome of the cases.
A Notice of Compliance was filed.
The court issued an order.
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 5
Notice of Compliance
Judge Assignment
Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant ( 4
Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 3
Notice of Compliance
to Order to Show Cause ( 10 )
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 8 articles
Timeline events
8 records on file
Last updated
16 hours, 18 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.