legal-news

Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al

26-cv-22102
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al is a civil case. The case is currently assigned to a judge, but the court and judge's name are unknown. The docket number is 26-cv-22102. The case summary is currently limited to the judge assignment. Further information is not available at this time.

Latest development

1:26-cv-22847 Cabrera-Ollero v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

Order · April 23, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Judge Assignment
  • Unknown Court
  • Unknown Judge
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant ( 4

Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

to Order to Show Cause ( 10 )

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

8 events
info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-22270 Hernandez v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

A new habeas corpus petition was filed in the case of Hernandez v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, case number 1:26-cv-22270. The petition, filed on behalf of the plaintiff, seeks to challenge the detention of the individual at the Krome North Service Processing Center. This development is relevant to the ongoing case of Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-20937 Alcocer v. Warden, Krome Service Processing Center et al

A Notice of Compliance was filed.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22853 Alcocer Ayala v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

Judge Alcocer Ayala has been assigned to the case Alcocer Ayala v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, which is related to Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al. This assignment is a procedural step in the case management process. The judge's assignment will impact the direction and pace of the case.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22847 Cabrera-Ollero v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22851 Becker Vives v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

The court granted Becker Vives permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee. This decision allows Vives to continue with his case against the Krome North Service Processing Center and its warden. The court's ruling is significant because it enables Vives to pursue his claims without financial burden.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22839 Victoria Gerena v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al

The court has consolidated a new case, Victoria Gerena v. Krome North Service Processing Center et al, with the existing case Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al. This consolidation will allow the court to manage related cases together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may impact the overall outcome of the cases.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22100 Escobar Pudis v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al

A Notice of Compliance was filed.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22102 Olmer v. Warden, Krome North Service Processing Center et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

8 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 8 articles

Timeline events

8 records on file

Last updated

16 hours, 18 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.