Southern District of Florida receives USCA mandate terminating appeal in Nunez v. Commissioner
Case Summary
The Southern District of Florida received a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals terminating the appeal in Nunez v. Commissioner. This mandate ends appellate review and returns the case to the district court for further proceedings or closure.
Latest development
2:23-cv-02437 PENDERGRASS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Appeal · May 11, 2026
The Southern District of Florida received a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals ending the appeal in the case Pendergrass v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 2:23-cv-02437. This means the appellate court has issued its final order, closing the appeal phase. The district court can now proceed based on this resolution.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Appellate mandate
- • Appeal termination
- • Tax litigation
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-06161 Strozyk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Commissioner of Social Security.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The Southern District of Florida received a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals ending the appeal in Nunez v. Commissioner, docket number 26-cv-60786. This mandate closes the appellate phase and sends the case back to the district court.
The district court has not yet assigned a judge to the matter. The case involves tax litigation, with the Commissioner as the respondent. The appellate court's mandate signals that it has completed its review and will take no further action.
The district court will now decide whether to proceed with further proceedings or close the case based on the appellate outcome. Recent filings include a transcript, answer, and administrative record submitted to the district court on May 11, 2026. The case remains active but awaits next steps from the district court.
Watch for the district court to assign a judge and issue orders that will determine the case's future trajectory.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
USCA Mandate (Terminates Appeal) ( 23
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
4 events3:25-cv-06161 Strozyk v. Commissioner of Social Security
A brief was filed.
2:23-cv-02437 PENDERGRASS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
The Southern District of Florida received a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals ending the appeal in the case Pendergrass v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 2:23-cv-02437. This means the appellate court has issued its final order, closing the appeal phase. The district court can now proceed based on this resolution.
9:26-cv-80298 Gilbert v. Commissioner of Social Security
A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
0:26-cv-60786 Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security
The court filed the transcript, answer, and administrative record in the case Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 0:26-cv-60786. This filing provides the official record of the administrative proceedings and the defendant's response. It sets the stage for the court's review of the Social Security claim.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.