5:26-cv-02116 Jose Francisco Orellana-Rivera v. J. Johnson et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) ( 2
Nicholas Ed Buskirk filed a lawsuit against R. Johnson et al. The case was filed on an in forma pauperis (IFP) basis, which means that Buskirk is seeking to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. The court has not yet taken any action on the case.
Latest development
Filing · April 24, 2026
Nicholas Ed Buskirk filed a financial entry in the case 2:21-cv-09065, indicating that he is seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he cannot afford to pay the filing fee. This filing is a key step in the case, as it allows Buskirk to proceed without paying the fee. The court will review his financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.
description View filingFinancial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A federal judge has allowed a habeas corpus petition to proceed, which means the court will review the legality of the petitioner's detention. This petition challenges the detention of Jose Francisco Orellana-Rivera, who is currently being held by J. Johnson et al. The court's decision allows Orellana-Rivera's case to move forward.
A Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants was filed.
Nicholas Ed Buskirk filed a financial entry in the case 2:21-cv-09065, indicating that he is seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he cannot afford to pay the filing fee. This filing is a key step in the case, as it allows Buskirk to proceed without paying the fee. The court will review his financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) ( 2
Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants (CV-134) - optional html form ( 7
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.