1:23-cv-15117 Jackson et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 15
In the case of Newman v. Abbott Laboratories et al, an order was issued on a motion to withdraw as attorney. The order was filed on an unknown date, with 15 pages of supporting documents. The court has not released further information about the case.
Stage
Court order issued
Timeline
9 events
Coverage
9 articles
Sources
1
A motion to withdraw as attorney was filed in the case of Newman v. Abbott Laboratories et al, with the court issuing an order on the matter. The order was filed on April 23, 2026, with 15 pages of supporting documents.
The court has not released further information about the case. The motion to withdraw is a key issue in the case, as it involves the withdrawal of an attorney from the lawsuit. The court has not yet assigned a judge to the case, and the status remains active.
The case is currently in a holding pattern, with no further developments reported. The court's decision on the motion to withdraw will be closely watched, as it will impact the future of the case. The case is related to other lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories, including Ferguson v. Abbott Laboratories et al and Fuller v. Abbott Laboratories et al. The court's allowance of excess pages in these related cases suggests that the court may be willing to accommodate additional filings in the Newman case.
The next development in the case will be the court's ruling on the motion to withdraw, which is expected to be a significant turning point in the case. The court's decision will determine the future of the case and the role of the withdrawing attorney. The case will continue to be closely watched as the court handles this key issue.
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 15
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 11
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
The court allowed the filing of excess pages in the case Ferguson v. Abbott Laboratories et al, which is related to the case Newman v. Abbott Laboratories et al. This means that the parties involved can submit additional documents beyond the original page limit. The court's decision allows the case to proceed with the additional information.
The court allowed the filing of excess pages in the case Fuller v. Abbott Laboratories et al, which is related to the case Newman v. Abbott Laboratories et al. This means that the Fuller case can now proceed with additional documentation. The filing of excess pages is a routine administrative task.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 15
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 14
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 11
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 15
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 10
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 9 articles
Timeline events
9 records on file
Last updated
17 hours, 56 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.