1:26-cv-23197 Murillo Munoz v. Miami ICE Field Office Director et al
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Murillo Munoz filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the Southern District of Florida, seeking to challenge his detention by the Miami ICE Field Office Director. The complaint alleges that Munoz's detention is unlawful and that he is entitled to be released. This filing marks the beginning of a habeas corpus proceeding, which will determine whether Munoz's detention is constitutional.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-23197 Murillo Munoz v. Miami ICE Field Office Director et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Miami ICE Field Office Director, 1:26-cv-23197 Murillo Munoz and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Murillo Munoz filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the Southern District of Florida, seeking to challenge his detention by the Miami ICE Field Office Director. The complaint alleges that Munoz's detention is unlawful and that he is entitled to be released. This filing marks the beginning of a habeas corpus proceeding, which will determine whether Munoz's detention is constitutional.
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.