1:26-cv-23138 Echeverria Lopez v. Miami ICE Field Office Director et al
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Echeverria Lopez filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the Southern District of Florida, seeking to challenge the detention of an individual. The writ is a legal action that requires the government to show cause why the individual should not be released from custody. This filing marks the beginning of a legal challenge to the government's authority to detain the individual.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-23138 Echeverria Lopez v. Miami ICE Field Office Director et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Miami ICE Field Office Director, 1:26-cv-23138 Echeverria Lopez and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Echeverria Lopez filed a complaint for a writ of habeas corpus in the Southern District of Florida, seeking to challenge the detention of an individual. The writ is a legal action that requires the government to show cause why the individual should not be released from custody. This filing marks the beginning of a legal challenge to the government's authority to detain the individual.
Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.