Attorney withdraws in long-running Motorola Solutions v. Hytera case in Illinois
Case Summary
Motorola Solutions and related plaintiffs sued Hytera Communications in the Northern District of Illinois. The docket notes an attorney withdrawal, reflecting changes in legal representation amid a long-running dispute.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Intellectual property
- • Attorney withdrawal
- • Corporate litigation
- • Northern District of Illinois
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:17-cv-01973 Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd. et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Hytera Communications Corporation Limited, Motorola Solutions, Inc.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
1 event1:17-cv-01973 Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd. et al
An attorney withdrew from representing a party in the Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd. case in 2022. This change affects who is legally responsible for the party's representation going forward. It may impact case strategy or timelines depending on the new counsel's approach.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
12 hours, 22 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.