Attorney Withdraws in Redner's Markets v. Lamb Weston Holdings in Northern District of Illinois
Case Summary
Redner's Markets, Inc. v. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. et al in the Northern District of Illinois, docket 24-cv-11801, recently saw an attorney withdraw from representation. No further substantive developments have been reported.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Attorney withdrawal
- • Commercial dispute
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-11801 Redner's Markets, Inc. v. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc, Redner's Markets, Inc and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
1 event1:24-cv-11801 Redner's Markets, Inc. v. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. et al
In the case Redner's Markets, Inc. v. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. et al, the attorney representing one of the parties filed a notice to withdraw from the case. This means the attorney will no longer represent their client, which could affect the client's legal strategy and timeline. The court must approve the withdrawal before it takes effect.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
12 hours, 56 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.