Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Referred to Judge Moorer
Case Summary
The court referred the motion to dismiss the second amended complaint to Judge Terry F. Moorer. This procedural step signals the court's intent to review the sufficiency of the plaintiff's amended claims under applicable legal standards.
Latest development
MOTIONS REFERRED: 60 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
Motion · May 12, 2026
An Amended Complaint was filed.
Key Issues
- • Motion to dismiss
- • Second amended complaint
- • Judicial referral
- • Pleadings sufficiency
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
MOTIONS REFERRED: 60 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
Motion · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
MOTIONS REFERRED: 60 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventMOTIONS REFERRED: 60 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint; referred to Judge Moorer. (fz)
An Amended Complaint was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
12 hours, 37 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.