civil-litigation court-watch

Choice Hotels Moves for Extension to File Response to Complaint with Proposed Order

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Choice Hotels International Services Corp. and Choice Hotels International, Inc. moved for an extension of time to file their response to the complaint. The motion included a proposed order for court approval.

Latest development

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint, by Choice Hotels International Services Corp., Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dahl, Christopher)

Order · May 12, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Extension of time
  • Response to complaint
  • Defendant procedural motions
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint, by Choice Hotels International Services Corp.,

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Related Organization

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Choice Hotels International Service Corp.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 16 hours, 24 minutes ago

Choice Hotels International, Inc. and Choice Hotels International Services Corp. have requested more time to respond to a complaint filed against them.

The motion for an extension of time was submitted on March 3, 2025, by counsel Christopher Dahl. The filing includes a proposed order but does not specify the underlying claims or the court handling the case. No judge has been assigned yet, and the docket number remains unavailable.

The extension request suggests the defendants need additional time to prepare their response or reply to the complaint, which could involve complex issues or require coordination among multiple parties. The case remains active but in its early stages, with procedural deadlines still in flux.

Without more information on the complaint's substance or the court's identity, the scope and stakes of the dispute are unclear. The next significant development will likely be the court's ruling on the extension motion or the defendants' eventual response to the complaint.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 16 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint, by Choice Hotels International Services Corp., Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dahl, Christopher) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint, by Choice Hotels International Services Corp., Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dahl, Christopher) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

11 hours, 42 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.