Mitchell v. 251 La Bodeguita Grocery Corp. et al: Extension of Time
Case Summary
The court has granted an extension of time in the case of Mitchell v. 251 La Bodeguita Grocery Corp. et al. The extension allows the parties to file additional documents and continue with the case. The case is currently ongoing, and the court will continue to review the matter.
Latest development
3:25-cv-05197 Kislenko v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Order · April 29, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Extension of time
- • Additional filings
- • Case ongoing
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( 26
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
3 events1:25-cv-05197 DOSS v. PAJAZETOVIC et al
The court granted a motion to withdraw as attorney for the defendant, Pajazetovic, in the case of DOSS v. PAJAZETovic et al. This means that the attorney representing Pajazetovic is no longer involved in the case. The extension of time is likely related to the withdrawal of the attorney.
3:25-cv-05197 Kislenko v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-05197 Mitchell v. 251 La Bodeguita Grocery Corp. et al
The court granted an extension of time for Mitchell v. 251 La Bodeguita Grocery Corp. et al, allowing the parties to file a response to a pending motion. This extension gives the parties more time to prepare their arguments. The extension is significant because it may impact the overall timeline of the case.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
3:25-cv-05197 Kislenko v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( 26
1:25-cv-05197 Mitchell v. 251 La Bodeguita Grocery Corp. et al
Extension of Time ( 23
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 week, 2 days ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.