2:25-cv-11562 Cash Now Funding Group LLC v. Miller et al
in Opposition to Motion ( 25 )
The court has allowed a substitute attorney to enter the case Walton v. Miles et al, which is related to the main case Miley et al v. Hatteras Funds, L.P. et al. This means that a new lawyer will now represent one of the parties in the case. The substitution of attorneys may impact the case's progress and strategy.
Latest development
Motion · April 27, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingin Opposition to Motion ( 25 )
Open original open_in_newScheduling Order ( 85
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
The court has allowed a substitute attorney to enter the case Walton v. Miles et al, which is related to the main case Miley et al v. Hatteras Funds, L.P. et al. This means that a new lawyer will now represent one of the parties in the case. The substitution of attorneys may impact the case's progress and strategy.
The court allowed a substitution of attorney in the case of Dorsey v. Miles et al, which is related to the main case of Miley et al v. Hatteras Funds, L.P. et al. This means that a new lawyer will represent one of the parties in the case. The substitution is likely due to a change in representation for the party.
A notice was filed in the case of Abdul-Aleem v. Miller et al, which is related to the case Miley et al v. Hatteras Funds, L.P. et al. This notice is part of the ongoing litigation. The exact nature of the notice is not specified.
The court issued an order.
The plaintiffs in the Miley et al v. Hatteras Funds, L.P. et al case filed a notice in the court. This notice is a procedural step that alerts the court and the parties involved of a specific action or development in the case. The notice is likely related to the case's status or a pending motion.
in Opposition to Motion ( 25 )
Notice - Other ( 57
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
8 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.