Metrocity Holdings, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.
Case Summary
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:22-cv-22541 Rusty115 Corp. et al v. Bank Of America, N.A..
Latest development
1:22-cv-22541 Rusty115 Corp. et al v. Bank Of America, N.A.
Order · May 12, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-22541 Rusty115 Corp. et al v. Bank Of America, N.A.
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Bank of America, N.A, Bank Of America, N.A, 9:22-cv-80980 Metrocity Holdings, LLC and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Metrocity Holdings, LLC filed suit against Bank of America, N.A. in the Southern District of Florida, opening case number 22-cv-80980. The complaint’s filing date is not publicly available, and the court has not yet assigned a judge.
The case remains active with limited public docket activity. The key issues in the dispute have not been disclosed, and the parties’ claims and defenses remain unclear.
The most recent docket entries, both dated May 12, 2026, reflect the court issuing orders related to setting, resetting, or cancelling a hearing. These orders suggest ongoing procedural adjustments but do not clarify the substantive matters at issue. The lack of a judge assignment and minimal filings indicate the case is in its early stages or experiencing delays.
Without a scheduled hearing or detailed filings, the case’s trajectory is uncertain. The absence of substantive motions or pleadings leaves the dispute’s nature and potential outcomes opaque. The court’s administrative orders may reflect scheduling conflicts or attempts to manage the docket efficiently.
Litigators tracking this case should watch for the assignment of a judge and the scheduling of a hearing. Those steps will likely trigger more substantive filings and clarify the parties’ positions. Until then, the case offers little insight into the claims Metrocity Holdings raises against Bank of America or the bank’s response.
The docket’s current state shows a procedural posture rather than a merits-based confrontation. The case remains a placeholder on the court’s calendar, pending further movement toward discovery or dispositive motions.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order Setting/Resetting/Cancelling Hearing
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order Setting/Resetting/Cancelling Hearing
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
2 events1:22-cv-22541 Rusty115 Corp. et al v. Bank Of America, N.A.
The court issued an order.
9:22-cv-80980 Metrocity Holdings, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
8 hours, 51 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.