MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the Motion (Dkt. 50) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. The Motion is granted as to Counts III and IV. The Motion is denied as to Count II; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the iss uance of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the parties are DIRECTED to contact the chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis to schedule a settlement conference; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the settlement con

The court issued a memorandum opinion and order granting in part and denying in part a motion addressing Counts II, III, and IV. The judge granted the motion as to Counts III and IV, effectively resolving those claims in favor of the moving party. The motion was denied as to Count II, allowing that claim to proceed.

The court directed the parties to contact U.S. Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis's chambers within fourteen days to schedule a settlement conference.

This order aims to encourage resolution before further litigation. The settlement conference must occur within fourteen days after the parties arrange it. The case remains active, with no public information on the filing date or court location.

The partial disposition narrows the issues for trial or further motion practice. The involvement of Magistrate Judge Davis signals the court’s intent to push the parties toward settlement. The next steps will clarify whether the parties can resolve Count II or if it will proceed to trial or additional motions.