civil-litigation court-opinion court-watch

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie M. Stamper is entitled to the full amount of the proceeds deposited into the Registry of the Court pursuant to the Court' ;s 8/7/2025 21 Order; directing that this matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket; further directing the Clerk to disburse the registry funds, together with any accrued interest, to Marie M. Stamper, care of counsel of record, subject to the

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie M. Stamper is entitled to the full amount of the proceeds deposited into the Registry of the Court pursuant to the Court' ;s 8/7/2025 21 Order; directing that this matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket; further directing the Clerk to disburse the registry funds, together with any accrued interest, to Marie M. Stamper, care of counsel of record, subject to the Court's standard registry procedures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph K. Reeder on 5/8/2026. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)

Latest development

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie M. Stamper is entitled to the full amount of the proceeds deposited into the Registry of the Court

Order · May 10, 2026

The court granted Defendant Marie M.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie

Order · May 10, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Joseph K. Reeder

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Joseph K. Reeder.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 6 hours, 40 minutes ago

Magistrate Judge Joseph K. Reeder granted summary judgment to defendant Marie M. Stamper on May 8, 2026.

The court found Stamper entitled to the full amount of funds held in the court's registry, which were deposited pursuant to an earlier order dated August 7, 2025. The decision directs the clerk to disburse the registry funds, including any accrued interest, to Stamper through her counsel.

The court dismissed the case and removed it from the active docket, effectively ending the litigation.

The ruling resolves the dispute over the registry funds in Stamper's favor without a trial. The motion for summary judgment argued that no genuine issue of material fact remained regarding Stamper's entitlement to the funds. The court agreed, relying on the prior order that initially placed the proceeds in the registry and the evidence presented in support of Stamper's claim.

No further claims or counterclaims remain pending. The dismissal and striking of the case from the docket confirm that the court considers the matter closed. The clerk's disbursement of funds will complete the practical resolution of the dispute.

The case record does not specify the underlying cause of the funds or the nature of the original dispute. The court's focus was limited to the proper recipient of the registry proceeds. Judge Reeder's opinion did not indicate any ongoing issues or potential appeals at this stage.

This order marks the final judicial action in the case. The court's instructions to the clerk ensure that Stamper will receive the full amount held in the registry, ending the litigation over these funds. The dismissal removes the case from the court's active docket, signaling no further judicial involvement.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 6 hours ago
The court granted Defendant Marie M.
receipt_long Source expand_more

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie M. Stamper is entitled to the full amount of the proceeds deposited into the Registry of the Court pursuant to the Court' ;s 8/7/2025 21 Order; directing that this matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket; further directing the Clerk to disburse the registry funds, together with any accrued interest, to Marie M. Stamper, care of counsel of record, subject to the Co

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 10, 2026

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Marie M. Stamper's 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that Marie M. Stamper is entitled to the full amount of the proceeds deposited into the Registry of the Court pursuant to the Court' ;s 8/7/2025 21 Order; directing that this matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from

The court granted Defendant Marie M.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

6 hours, 55 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.