civil-litigation court-watch

Judge Furman Grants Adjournment for Richard Bermudez Conference to May 20, 2026

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted a request to adjourn a conference related to Richard Bermudez. The conference was rescheduled to May 20, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. The clerk was directed to terminate the related docket entry 316.

Latest development

MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Richard Bermudez on 316 LETTER MOTION re Request for Adjournment: Application GRANTED. The conference is hereby ADJOURNED to May 20, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate

Order · May 11, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Adjournment
  • Conference scheduling
  • Judicial order
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Richard Bermudez on 316 LETTER MOTION re Request for Adjournment: Application GRANTED. The

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Jesse M. Furman

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jesse M. Furman.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 20 hours ago

Judge Jesse M. Furman granted a request to adjourn a scheduled conference in the case involving Richard Bermudez. The court moved the conference to May 20, 2026, at 2:30 p.m.

This decision came through a memo endorsement issued on May 11, 2026, in response to a letter motion filed under docket entry 316. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion docketed as number 316, signaling the court’s acceptance of the adjournment request. The reasons behind the request for adjournment have not been disclosed in the public record.

The case remains active, but no further details about the underlying dispute, parties involved beyond Bermudez, or the court handling the matter have been made available. This procedural development delays the next scheduled court activity by several months, pushing any substantive progress back accordingly.

The court’s order reflects a routine scheduling adjustment rather than a substantive ruling on the merits of the case.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Richard Bermudez on 316 LETTER MOTION re Request for Adjournment: Application GRANTED. The conference is hereby ADJOURNED to May 20, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Doc. #316. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/11/2026) (ab) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Richard Bermudez on 316 LETTER MOTION re Request for Adjournment: Application GRANTED. The conference is hereby ADJOURNED to May 20, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Doc. #316. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/11/2026) (ab) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 3 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.