civil-litigation court-watch

Judge Sidney H. Stein Approves Stipulation Regarding Restitution in Hassan Nemazee Case

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Sidney H. Stein approved a stipulation regarding restitution in a judgment involving Hassan Nemazee. The endorsement was signed on December 27, 2022, following a letter motion by counsel.

Latest development

MEMO ENDORSEMENT 181 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Lawrence McMichael, Esquire dated December 27, 2022 re: 66 Judgment,, re: Stipulation Regarding Restitution...ENDORSEMENT...Approved. SO ORDERED

Order · May 10, 2026

A Motion was filed.

Key Issues

  • Restitution stipulation
  • Judgment enforcement
  • Court approval
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

MEMO ENDORSEMENT 181 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Lawrence McMichael, Esquire dated December

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Sidney H. Stein

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Sidney H. Stein.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 23 hours ago

Judge Sidney H. Stein approved a stipulation regarding restitution on December 27, 2022. The stipulation followed a letter motion filed by Lawrence McMichael, Esquire, addressing the judgment in the case.

The court's endorsement formally incorporated the restitution agreement into the judgment. This action signals the court's acceptance of the parties' negotiated terms on restitution, which likely resolves outstanding financial obligations tied to the judgment. The docket does not provide further details on the underlying dispute or the amount involved.

The case remains active, with no public filings indicating final resolution or appeal as of early 2023. The judge's endorsement streamlines enforcement of the restitution terms by embedding them in the court's judgment. The case awaits further procedural developments or compliance with the restitution order.

Parties may still contest execution or seek modification, but the current record shows the court's clear approval of the agreed restitution framework.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

MEMO ENDORSEMENT 181 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Lawrence McMichael, Esquire dated December 27, 2022 re: 66 Judgment,, re: Stipulation Regarding Restitution...ENDORSEMENT...Approved. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 12/27/22) (jw) (Entered: 01/03/2023)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 10, 2026

MEMO ENDORSEMENT 181 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Lawrence McMichael, Esquire dated December 27, 2022 re: 66 Judgment,, re: Stipulation Regarding Restitution...ENDORSEMENT...Approved. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 12/27/22) (jw) (Entered: 01/03/2023)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

12 hours, 21 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.