legal-news

MEDARD v. TSOUKARIS et al

25-cv-15279
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

MEDARD v. TSOUKARIS et al is a civil case where the plaintiff is seeking to enforce a judgment against the defendant in an unknown court with docket number 25-cv-15279. The exact nature of the dispute is not specified in the current summary. The case is currently pending, and the risk assessment is unknown due to the lack of information provided.

Latest development

3:26-cv-04427 ZAMBRANO ERAS v. TSOUKARIS et al

Order · April 23, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • enforce judgment
  • unknown court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 17 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
gavel
Order April 23, 2026

3:26-cv-04427 ZAMBRANO ERAS v. TSOUKARIS et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 23, 2026

2:26-cv-04427 ZAMBRANO ERAS v. TSOUKARIS et al

The court has issued a writ of habeas corpus in the case of ZAMBRANO ERAS v. TSOUKARIS et al, allowing the petitioner to challenge their detention. This writ is a legal order requiring the government to produce the petitioner before the court to determine the legality of their detention. The writ was issued in the case 2:26-cv-04427.

info
Other April 22, 2026

2:25-cv-15279 MEDARD v. TSOUKARIS et al

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

16 hours, 22 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.