newspaper
civil-litigation
federal-courts
McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
26-cv-03975
N.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The defendants in McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al have been granted an extension of time to file their answer. This means they now have more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. The extension is for 43 days.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-03975 Sanders v. Apple, Inc.
Other · May 02, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 02, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Wexford Health Sources, Inc, 1:26-cv-03975 McKinnie and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
chronic
Updated 23 hours, 30 minutes ago
The Story So Far
McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-03975.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-03975 McKinnie on one side and Wexford Health Sources, Inc on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 2, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendants in McKinnie v. et al have been granted an extension of time to file their answer.
This means they now have more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. The extension is for 43 days.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 1, 2026
3:26-cv-03975 Sanders v. Apple, Inc.
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
1:26-cv-03975 McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
The defendants in McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al have been granted an extension of time to file their answer. This means they now have more time to respond to the plaintiff's claims. The extension is for 43 days.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:26-cv-03975 McKinnie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 43
May 1, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 30 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.