newspaper
legal-news
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
20-cv-05640
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
A federal judge denied Epic Games' request to force Apple to restore Fortnite to the App Store. The ruling means Apple can continue to enforce its in-app payment guidelines, which Epic Games claims are anticompetitive. This decision is a significant setback for Epic Games in its ongoing lawsuit against Apple.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
4 events
info
Other
May 1, 2026
3:26-cv-03972 Harris v. Apple, Inc.
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
3:26-cv-03902 Alowonle v. Apple, Inc.
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
3:26-cv-03898 Hopkins v. Apple, Inc.
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
4:20-cv-05640 Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
A federal judge denied Epic Games' request to force Apple to restore Fortnite to the App Store. The ruling means Apple can continue to enforce its in-app payment guidelines, which Epic Games claims are anticompetitive. This decision is a significant setback for Epic Games in its ongoing lawsuit against Apple.
Advertisement
newspaper
4 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
9 hours, 29 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.