2:24-cv-00723 McCroskey v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
Stipulated Motion ( 25
McCroskey v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al is a civil case with a current summary of Stipulated Motion ( 25. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 24-cv-00723. The details of the case are not available.
Latest development
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-00723 Harvey v. Strategic Retail Partners et al
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Strategic Retail Partners and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
McCroskey v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, docket number 24-cv-00723, is an active civil case in the Western District of Washington. The case involves claims related to insurance coverage and alleged bad faith or mishandling of claims, with an underlying property or real-estate dispute.
The court has not yet assigned a judge. The parties filed a stipulated motion recently, indicating some agreement on a procedural or substantive matter. The case remains in early stages, with limited publicly available details about the underlying facts or claims.
The docket shows two motions filed in quick succession, one on April 24, 2026, and another on May 11, 2026. Both entries describe motions but do not specify their content beyond the stipulated motion reference. There is no ruling or order attached to these motions yet.
The lack of a judge assignment suggests the case is still settling into the court’s calendar.
The case’s federal jurisdiction likely stems from diversity or a federal question related to insurance law and property disputes. The involvement of a property and casualty insurer points to a dispute over coverage or claims handling following a loss or damage to real property. The stipulated motion may concern scheduling, discovery, or a procedural agreement to streamline the case.
Watch for the court’s response to the stipulated motion. The next docket entry could clarify the parties’ positions or set deadlines for discovery or dispositive motions. A ruling on the motion might also signal progress toward settlement or narrow the issues for trial.
Until then, the case remains in procedural limbo with no substantive rulings or disclosures.
Order on Motion for Summary Judgment ( 37
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
Stipulated Motion ( 25
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.