1:25-cv-06845 MAURER v. LOMAS PLAZA, LLC et al
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 24
Civil case in D.N.J. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:25-cv-06845 MAURER v. LOMAS PLAZA, LLC et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-06845 MAURER v. LOMAS PLAZA, LLC et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes LOMAS PLAZA, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
MAURER v. LOMAS PLAZA: Stipulation of Dismissal Filed is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-06845.
The main identified defendant or respondent is LOMAS PLAZA, LLC. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, settlement, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 24
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.