2:26-cv-04882 COLLINS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
Diversity Disclosure Statement ( 3
The court has received a Diversity Disclosure Statement from the plaintiff in the case of Collins v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al, which is a required filing in diversity cases. This statement provides information about the parties involved and their citizenship, which is necessary for the court to determine whether the case meets the requirements for diversity jurisdiction. The filing is a routine step in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
The court has received a Diversity Disclosure Statement from the plaintiff in the case of Collins v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al, which is a required filing in diversity cases. This statement provides information about the parties involved and their citizenship, which is necessary for the court to determine whether the case meets the requirements for diversity jurisdiction. The filing is a routine step in the case.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The parties in the case Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al have filed a Meet and Confer Statement, which is a required step in the pre-trial process. This statement indicates that the parties have met to discuss the case and have conferred on the issues at hand. The filing of this statement is a procedural step that helps to move the case forward.
The court has consolidated the case of Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al with another case, ANDELO v. Trans Union LLC et al, under the same docket number. This consolidation allows the two cases to be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may reduce the overall cost and time required to resolve the cases.
The court has consolidated the case of Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al with another case, ANDELO v. Trans Union LLC et al, under the same docket number. This consolidation allows the two cases to be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may reduce the overall cost and time required to resolve the cases.
The court issued a scheduling report in the case of Gaston v. Trans Union LLC et al, which is related to the case of Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al. This report outlines the parties' obligations under Rule 26(f) and 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The report is a key step in the discovery process, which is key for the progression of the case.
The court docket for Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al was updated with a new case, 1:26-cv-04732 OLIVARES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al. This new case is likely a separate lawsuit involving the same defendant, Trans Union LLC. The addition of this new case may impact the overall docket and scheduling for Mooney III v.
A Summons was issued.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Mooney III v. Trans Union LLC et al case. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving sensitive data.
Diversity Disclosure Statement ( 3
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 26
Meet and Confer Statement ( 25
Scheduling Report - Rule 26(f)/16.1 ( 35
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 8 articles
Timeline events
9 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.