civil-litigation federal-courts

Central District of California updates address in Van Steenwyk v. Van Steenwyk case

20-cv-02375 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Central District of California updated the address information in the case Van Steenwyk v. Van Steenwyk, docket 20-cv-02375. This administrative change ensures accurate contact details for parties or counsel.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Address update
  • Central District of California
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:20-cv-02375 Matthew D. Van Steenwyk v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al

Other · May 13, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk, Matthew D. Van Steenwyk.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

2:20-cv-02375 Matthew D. Van Steenwyk v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al

The court recorded a change of address for one of the parties in the case Matthew D. Van Steenwyk v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al, docket number 2:20-cv-02375. This update ensures that all future court communications reach the correct location. Keeping contact information current is critical for procedural fairness and timely notice.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.