Norvell Andrew sues Warden Doerer in Central District of California over civil rights claims
Case Summary
Norvell Andrew filed a case against Warden Jacob Doerer in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-00198. Recent filings include a change of address, indicating ongoing litigation possibly involving prison conditions or civil rights claims.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Prison conditions
- • Civil rights
- • Warden defendant
- • Litigation status
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:24-cv-00198 Norvell Andrew v. Warden Jacob Doerer
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Warden Jacob Doerer, Norvell Andrew.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:24-cv-00198 Norvell Andrew v. Warden Jacob Doerer
Norvell Andrew filed a notice of change of address in the case against Warden Jacob Doerer, as recorded in docket entry 43. This update ensures that all future court communications will be sent to the correct location. Keeping the court informed of address changes is critical to maintaining proper notice and procedural fairness.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
18 hours, 55 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.