5:26-cv-02449 Son Hong Nguyen v. D. Marin et al
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
In case 25-cv-13254 before the District of Massachusetts, Martin and others face Jenkins and others. A motion hearing is scheduled, and a temporary restraining order is involved.
Latest development
Order · May 8, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:26-cv-02449 Son Hong Nguyen v. D. Marin et al
Order · May 08, 2026
Coverage
6 articles
5 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
11 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 5:26-cv-02449 Son Hong Nguyen and others.
Press monitoring has found 6 related articles from 5 distinct sources.
Martin et al v. Jenkins et al: Motion Hearing Scheduled in District of Massachusetts is an active criminal matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 25-cv-13254.
The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
Jenkins et al is a civil case in the District of Massachusetts. A motion hearing has been scheduled for the case. The docket number is 25-cv-13254.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court in the District of Massachusetts scheduled a motion hearing for the case Gordon v. Martin et al, which is related to the case Martin et al v. Jenkins et al.
The hearing is likely to address a pending motion in the Gordon case. This development may. On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court scheduled a motion hearing in the case of Shalom et al v. Masri et al, case number 1:25-cv-23837, in the District of Massachusetts. The hearing is related to a motion to appear pro hac vice, which allows an attorney to appear in a case outside their. On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court in the District of Massachusetts granted a continuance of speedy trial deadlines in the case of USA v. MARTINEZ et al, case number 2:25-mj-09083-10. This means that the trial will be delayed, and the parties will have more time to prepare. The.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
Open original open_in_newMotion Hearing
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
The court issued an order.
The court in the District of Massachusetts scheduled a motion hearing for the case Gordon v. Martin et al, which is related to the case Martin et al v. Jenkins et al. The hearing is likely to address a pending motion in the Gordon case. This development may impact the overall timeline of the Martin case.
The court scheduled a motion hearing in the case of Shalom et al v. Masri et al, case number 1:25-cv-23837, in the District of Massachusetts. The hearing is related to a motion to appear pro hac vice, which allows an attorney to appear in a case outside their usual jurisdiction. This hearing is significant because it may impact the ability of the attorneys involved to participate in the case.
The court in the District of Massachusetts granted a continuance of speedy trial deadlines in the case of USA v. MARTINEZ et al, case number 2:25-mj-09083-10. This means that the trial will be delayed, and the parties will have more time to prepare. The continuance was likely granted due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to gather evidence.
The court in the District of Massachusetts granted a continuance of speedy trial deadlines in the case of USA v. MARTINEZ et al, case number 2:25-mj-09083-2. This means that the trial will be delayed, and the parties will have more time to prepare. The continuance was likely granted due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to gather evidence.
A Motion was filed.
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
Appear Pro Hac Vice - aty ( 50
Continuance of Speedy Trial Deadlines ( 236
Continuance of Speedy Trial Deadlines ( 235
Sources tracked
5 outlets · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
5 hours, 23 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.