judicial-watch

Madison v. Freeman Expositions, Inc.

26-cv-02505
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Madison v. Freeman Expositions, Inc. is a civil case with an extending time to answer motion. The court's docket number is 26-cv-02505. The case involves an extending time to answer motion, which is a request by the defendant to extend the time to respond to the plaintiff's complaint. This type of motion is often used when the defendant needs more time to prepare a response.

Latest development

1:26-cv-02505 Madison v. Freeman Expositions, Inc.

Order · April 23, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • extending time to answer
  • • court docket
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge ( 10

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

2:26-cv-02505 Marcelo Gomez v. Swift Auto Parts, Inc. et al

The court granted Marcelo Gomez's motion to extend the time to answer in the case of 2:26-cv-02505, giving Swift Auto Parts, Inc. and other defendants 30 days or less to respond. This means the defendants now have more time to prepare their response to Gomez's claims. The extension is likely to give the defendants a chance to gather evidence and develop their defense.

description View filing open_in_new
gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-02505 Madison v. Freeman Expositions, Inc.

The court issued an order.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.