legal-news

Luis Alonzo Calixtro v. Markwayne Mullin et al

26-cv-01797
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This entry duplicates case 16644 — same caption (Luis Alonzo Calixtro v. Markwayne Mullin et al), same docket number (26-cv-01797), and the same 'Immigration 2241 Full Consent' notation. The underlying matter is a Section 2241 habeas petition challenging immigration detention. As with cases 16642 and 16643, this appears to be a system-level duplication rather than a distinct legal proceeding.

Latest development

5:26-cv-01919 Xia Pia v. Markwayne Mullins et al

Order · April 20, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Duplicate docket entry requiring reconciliation
  • Section 2241 immigration habeas petition
  • Full consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 hour, 33 minutes ago

Luis Alonzo Calixtro filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the Western District of Oklahoma on April 20, 2026, challenging his immigration detention. The respondents include Senator Markwayne Mullin, though the precise basis for naming Mullin has not been detailed in available filings.

The case carries an 'Immigration 2241 Full Consent' notation, meaning Calixtro has consented to have a magistrate judge handle all proceedings, including final disposition.

The docket number is 26-cv-01797, but this entry appears to be a system-level duplicate of at least two other docket entries — cases 16642 and 16643 — carrying the same caption and the same underlying petition. No judge has been assigned. Until the court reconciles the duplicate entries, it is unclear which docket will carry the live proceeding forward.

Section 2241 is the standard vehicle for a detained person to challenge the legality of federal custody. In the immigration context, petitioners typically argue that their detention is prolonged without adequate process, that a removal order is unlawful, or that the government lacks authority to hold them under current statutory or constitutional limits.

The specific grounds Calixtro raises are not yet visible in the public record.

The court issued an order on April 20, 2026 — the same day the petition was filed. The content of that order is not detailed in available information, but same-day orders in habeas cases typically address service on respondents, set a response deadline, or flag procedural defects. No response from the government appears in the record yet.

The duplicate docket problem is the immediate obstacle. If the clerk's office does not consolidate or close the redundant entries, the case risks procedural confusion — competing dockets, missed deadlines, or conflicting orders. That administrative question will resolve before any merits briefing begins.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 2 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form ( 4

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order April 20, 2026

5:26-cv-01919 Xia Pia v. Markwayne Mullins et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 20, 2026

5:26-cv-01797 Luis Alonzo Calixtro v. Markwayne Mullin et al

A federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 was filed in the Western District of Oklahoma, with Luis Alonzo Calixtro challenging his immigration detention and naming Senator Markwayne Mullin among the respondents. Both parties consented to full magistrate judge jurisdiction, meaning a magistrate — not an Article III district judge — will handle the case from start to finish. The 'Immigration 2241' designation signals Calixtro is contesting the lawfulness of his custody, not seeking relief on a criminal conviction.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 5 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.