civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al

24-cv-06746 S.D.N.Y.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A Stipulation and Proposed Order was filed in the Southern District of New York for Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al. This indicates the parties have reached an agreement on a specific issue and are seeking the court's approval. The details of the agreement are contained within the proposed order.

Latest development

3:24-cv-06746 Kushnir v. Mayorkas et al

Order · May 7, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Stipulation
  • Proposed Order
  • Party Agreement
  • Court Approval
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:24-cv-06746 Kushnir v. Mayorkas et al

Order · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 7:24-cv-06746 Lowrance and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 11 hours, 14 minutes ago

Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 24-cv-06746.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 7:24-cv-06746 Lowrance. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al case.

This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 26

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 7, 2026

3:24-cv-06746 Kushnir v. Mayorkas et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other May 4, 2026

7:24-cv-06746 Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Lowrance et al v. Ayoub et al case. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

6 hours, 25 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.