legal-news

Louis v. Charles

25-cv-10679
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court issued Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in the case of Louis v. Charles, case number 1:25-cv-10679. This document outlines the court's findings and conclusions regarding the case. The findings and conclusions are likely to have a significant impact on the outcome of the case.

Latest development

1:25-cr-00563-1 USA v. Louis

Motion · April 29, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
edit_note
Motion 2 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Memorandum in Opposition to Motion ( 14

Open original open_in_new
edit_note
Motion 2 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Letter Motion ( 34

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
edit_note
Motion April 29, 2026

1:25-cr-00563-1 USA v. Louis

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
edit_note
Motion April 29, 2026

1:24-cr-00225-1 USA v. Charles

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 29, 2026

1:25-cv-10679 Louis v. Charles

The court issued Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in the case of Louis v. Charles, case number 1:25-cv-10679. This document outlines the court's findings and conclusions regarding the case. The findings and conclusions are likely to have a significant impact on the outcome of the case.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 3 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.