5:25-cv-06048 Executive Lens LLC v. Rapkin
Joint Case Management Statement ( 43
The Central District of California filed a joint case management statement in Rauhauser v. Beacon Hill, docket 25-cv-06048. The statement outlines the parties' positions on scheduling and discovery plans to guide the court's management of the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:25-cv-06048 Executive Lens LLC v. Rapkin
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs, 2 Related Organizations
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Beacon Hill Solutions Group, LLC, 2:25-cv-06048 Lisa Rauhauser, 5:25-cv-06048 Executive Lens LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Lisa Rauhauser v. Beacon Hill Solutions Group, LLC et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-06048.
The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-06048 Lisa Rauhauser and 5:25-cv-06048 Executive Lens LLC on one side and Beacon Hill Solutions Group, LLC on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, contract dispute, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court set or revised the case schedule. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The mediation in Lisa Rauhauser v. Beacon Hill Solutions Group, LLC et al failed to reach an agreement.
The parties were unable to come to a resolution through mediation, as reported in the ADR-3 mediation report. This means the case will continue to move.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court set or revised the case schedule.
The mediation in Lisa Rauhauser v. Beacon Hill Solutions Group, LLC et al failed to reach an agreement. The parties were unable to come to a resolution through mediation, as reported in the ADR-3 mediation report. This means the case will continue to move forward in the court.
Joint Case Management Statement ( 43
Mediation Report (ADR-3) Unable to Reach Agreement ( 28
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
7 hours, 31 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.