4:25-cv-05037 Kady et al v. Opencare, Inc.
Joint Case Management Statement ( 50
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active. Latest development: 4:25-cv-05037 Kady et al v. Opencare, Inc.. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:25-cv-05037 Kady et al v. Opencare, Inc.
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Opencare, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Kady et al v. Opencare, Inc. is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-05037.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Opencare, Inc. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court set or revised the case schedule.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court set or revised the case schedule.
Joint Case Management Statement ( 50
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.