Linzy v. City and County of Denver et al.

A federal court issued an order on a motion to consolidate cases in Linzy v. City and County of Denver et al., docket 1:25-cv-01613. The plaintiff is suing the City and County of Denver and additional defendants whose identities have not yet been fully disclosed in available filings.

No judge has been assigned to the case as of the latest docket entries.

The consolidation motion — docket entry 72 — signals that at least one related case is pending in the same court. Consolidation orders typically mean the court sees overlapping facts, parties, or legal questions across multiple dockets. The outcome of that motion will shape how broadly or narrowly this litigation proceeds.

The underlying claims against Denver remain thin on public detail at this stage. Denver is a frequent defendant in civil rights and police misconduct litigation in federal court, and the filing pattern here — a named individual plaintiff against a city and county plus unnamed or additional defendants — fits that profile.

Nothing in the available record confirms that framing, but it is the most common posture for this type of suit.

The case was filed in 2025 and remains active. The absence of an assigned judge is a gap worth watching; once a judge takes the case, scheduling orders and any early motion practice will set the pace for discovery and dispositive briefing. Until then, the consolidation ruling is the most concrete development on the docket.