2:22-cv-02999 FENNER-SNYDER v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
Order of Dismissal ( 4
The District of Columbia court issued an Order of Dismissal in LEOPOLD et al v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION. The case, filed under docket number 22-cv-02999, concerns the National Archives and Records Administration. Further details on the grounds for dismissal are not provided in the current information.
Latest development
Order · May 8, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:22-cv-02999 FENNER-SNYDER v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN
Order · May 08, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN, National Archives and Records Administration.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
LEOPOLD et al v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION is an active civil matter in the District of Columbia under docket 22-cv-02999. The main identified defendant or respondent is NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION.
Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts. The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a joint status report filed by the parties. The court has yet to assign a judge to the case. The parties' joint status report suggests they are working towards a resolution, but the exact nature of their efforts remains unclear.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest joint status report produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions. The court's order on May 8, 2026, indicates that the case remains active, but the specifics of the order are not yet clear.
As the case continues to unfold, Juryvine will provide updates on key developments and filings. The parties' joint status report and the court's order demonstrate that the case is moving forward, but the exact path ahead is still uncertain.
The District of Columbia court will continue to oversee the case, and Juryvine will track the latest developments as they become available. The court's next move will be key in determining the case's trajectory, and Juryvine will provide updates on any significant filings or orders.
Order of Dismissal ( 4
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
The court issued an order.
The parties filed a joint status report.
Order of Dismissal ( 4
Status Report ( 48
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.