Defendants Waive Service in Kulisz et al v. PayPal, Inc. in Southern District of New York
Case Summary
Kulisz et al v. PayPal, Inc., pending in the Southern District of New York (docket 25-cv-10846), recently saw a waiver of service executed. This procedural step indicates the defendants have been formally notified of the lawsuit and will respond accordingly. The case likely involves claims against PayPal related to its business practices or transactions.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Waiver of service
- • Notification of defendants
- • Claims against PayPal
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-10846 Kulisz et al v. PayPal, Inc.
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:25-cv-10846 Kulisz et al v. PayPal, Inc.
The plaintiffs in Kulisz et al v. PayPal, Inc. completed the waiver of service process, officially notifying PayPal of the lawsuit without formal service of summons. This step speeds up the litigation by allowing PayPal to respond without the delays of traditional service methods. It confirms that PayPal has received notice and will participate in the case.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.