Evans v. Mckenna in Southern District of New York Advances After Waiver of Service
Case Summary
Evans filed suit against Mckenna in the Southern District of New York. The waiver of service was executed, indicating the defendant has formally accepted service of process. The case is in early stages, moving toward initial pleadings or motions.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Service of process
- • Civil litigation initiation
- • Defendant response
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
7:25-cv-07016 Evans v. Mckenna
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event7:25-cv-07016 Evans v. Mckenna
The court recorded that the defendant, Mckenna, waived formal service of the complaint in the Evans v. Mckenna case, docket number 7:25-cv-07016. This means Mckenna agreed to accept the lawsuit papers without requiring formal delivery by a process server. Waiving service typically speeds up the litigation process by removing procedural delays.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.