Northern District of California weighs motion to seal documents in Khankin v. CSL Behring
Case Summary
Khankin v. CSL Behring, L.L.C. is pending in the Northern District of California under docket 24-cv-04030. The parties filed an administrative motion to seal certain documents, indicating sensitive or confidential information is involved. The court's decision on this motion will affect the transparency of the case.
Latest development
5:24-cv-04030 Khankin v. CSL Behring, L.L.C.
Motion · May 12, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Motion to file under seal
- • Confidentiality concerns
- • Northern District of California jurisdiction
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:24-cv-04030 Khankin v. CSL Behring, L.L.C.
Motion · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CSL Behring, L.L.C.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ( 64
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:24-cv-04030 Khankin v. CSL Behring, L.L.C.
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 36 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.