2:23-cv-04229 Matthew R. Novitzky v. Transunion LLC et al
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 214
Joseph Stephen Meadows filed a lawsuit against Trans Union, LLC et al. The case is currently in the scheduling phase, with a text-only notice being the only update available. The court and docket information are unknown.
Latest development
Order · April 24, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingThe case of Joseph Stephen Meadows v. Trans Union, LLC et al, filed in the US District Court, has taken a significant turn with the issuance of a scheduling notice on April 24, 2026. The notice outlines upcoming deadlines and procedures for the parties involved, marking a key milestone in the case's progression.
The court's scheduling notice is a key development, as it provides a roadmap for the parties to follow in the coming weeks and months. The case is currently in the active phase, with a judge yet to be assigned.
The court's decision to issue a scheduling notice suggests that the case is moving forward, with the parties expected to take action in the near future. The notice is a text-only update, providing limited information on the case's specifics. it is clear that the court is actively managing the case, with a focus on moving it forward in a timely manner.
The parties involved, including Joseph Stephen Meadows and Trans Union, LLC et al, will need to take action in response to the scheduling notice, which will likely involve filing additional documents or taking other steps to advance the case. The court's extension of time for the related case of Rebull v. Trans Union, LLC et al may also have implications for the ongoing litigation, although the specifics of this development are not yet clear. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely that additional updates will be issued, providing further insight into the parties' actions and the court's decisions.
The case's progression will be closely watched, particularly in light of the court's recent activity. The parties involved will need to handle the complex procedures outlined in the scheduling notice, which will likely involve a range of legal and logistical challenges.
The court's management of the case will be critical in determining its ultimate outcome, and it is likely that the parties will be closely monitoring the court's decisions and actions in the coming weeks and months.
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 214
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order.
The court granted an extension of time for the case Rebull v. Trans Union, LLC et al, allowing the parties more time to proceed. This extension is relevant to the ongoing litigation between the parties. The exact duration of the extension is not specified.
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Joseph Stephen Meadows v. Trans Union, LLC et al, informing the parties of upcoming deadlines and procedures. This notice is a routine step in the litigation process, helping to manage the case's timeline and ensure that all parties are aware of their obligations. The notice does not indicate any significant developments in the case.
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 214
Extension of Time ( 8
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.