civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RAMIREZ et al: Certificate of Service

25-cv-15902 D.N.J.
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. filed a Certificate of Service in its case against Ramirez and others in the District of New Jersey. This filing confirms that documents were properly served to opposing parties.

Latest development

2:25-cv-15902 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RAMIREZ et al

Motion · May 6, 2026

The court has been notified that a Certificate of Service has been filed in the case of Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ramirez et al. This means that the parties have confirmed that the required documents have been served to all relevant parties. The filing is a procedural step in the case.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Certificate of Service
  • Service of process
  • Entertainment law
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Motion practice

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-15902 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RAMIREZ et al

Motion · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Joe Hand Promotions, Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 20 hours ago

JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RAMIREZ et al: Certificate of Service is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-15902.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-15902 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: The court has been notified that a Certificate of Service has been filed in the case of Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. Ramirez et al. This means that the parties have confirmed that the required documents have been served to all relevant parties.

The filing is.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
edit_note
Motion May 6, 2026

2:25-cv-15902 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RAMIREZ et al

The court has been notified that a Certificate of Service has been filed in the case of Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ramirez et al. This means that the parties have confirmed that the required documents have been served to all relevant parties. The filing is a procedural step in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 20 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.