civil-litigation federal-courts

Jim O. Pavia v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

25-cv-02712 C.D. Cal.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jim O. Pavia filed a civil lawsuit against Porsche Cars North America, Inc. in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-02712. No further details on claims or case status are available.

Latest development

2:25-cv-02712 Wright v. Safeway

Order · May 12, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Product liability or consumer dispute
  • Automotive industry
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-02712 Wright v. Safeway

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Porsche Cars North America, Inc, 8:25-cv-02712 Jim O. Pavia and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 hour, 41 minutes ago

Jim O. Pavia filed a lawsuit against Porsche Cars North America, Inc. in the Central District of California, recorded under docket number 25-cv-02712.

The case is active but lacks a publicly assigned judge. The filing appears to involve a product liability or consumer dispute related to the automotive sector, though the complaint's specifics remain undisclosed. The court issued an order on May 12, 2026, but the content and impact of that order are not publicly available.

No motions, answers, or other pleadings have been filed or made public since the initial filing. The absence of detailed filings leaves the case's factual and legal issues unclear. This lawsuit could involve claims about vehicle defects, warranty breaches, or other consumer protection matters common in automotive litigation.

The lack of a judge assignment suggests the case is still in early procedural stages. Monitoring docket updates will be necessary to understand how the dispute develops and what legal theories Pavia advances against Porsche.

The case highlights ongoing tensions between consumers and automotive manufacturers over product performance and safety in federal court.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 3 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order Dismissing Case ( 7

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

2:25-cv-02712 Wright v. Safeway

The court issued an order.

info
Other May 12, 2026

8:25-cv-02712 Jim O. Pavia v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

The case Jim O. Pavia v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. was filed under docket number 8:25-cv-02712. No further details or actions have been recorded in this event. This marks the official start of the litigation process between the parties.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 hours, 28 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.