1:26-cv-03596 Richardson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Civil Cover Sheet ( 2
The JANE SU118 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al case is a civil lawsuit with an unknown court. The docket number is 26-cv-03596. The current summary is a Proposed Summons with 2 pages. The case involves a dispute between JANE SU118 and Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. The exact nature of the dispute is unclear. The case is ongoing, with no further information available.
Latest development
Order · April 27, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingOrder on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ( 162
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A new case, Richardson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al, was filed in the court, which is a separate matter from Jane Su118 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. The filing of a Civil Cover Sheet indicates that the parties are providing basic information about the case, such as the parties involved and the nature of the dispute. This is a routine step in the court process.
A Summons was issued.
A Summons was issued.
A Summons was issued.
A new case, JANE SU118 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed in the court. The case is assigned to Judge NLG in the New Hampshire district court. The case number is 3:26-cv-03769.
A Summons was issued.
A Motion was filed.
A Summons was issued.
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case of Jane Su118 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. The document in question is a confidential settlement agreement between the parties. This decision allows the parties to keep the terms of the settlement private.
Civil Cover Sheet ( 2
Proposed Summons ( 3
Proposed Summons ( 3
Proposed Summons ( 3
Proposed Summons ( 3
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ( 162
Proposed Summons ( 2
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ( 8
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 10 articles
Timeline events
10 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.