legal-news

James T Lucanish et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

25-cv-09483
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

James T Lucanish and others filed a lawsuit against Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The docket number is 25-cv-09483. The current summary is a reply filed by the plaintiffs in response to a motion by the defendant. The reply is related to an unknown issue and was filed on an unknown date. The filing fee was $23. The court has not yet taken any action on the reply. The case is still in its early stages, and it is unclear what the outcome will be. The plaintiffs are seeking an unknown relief, and the defendant has not yet responded to the lawsuit. The case is being closely watched by legal observers, who are waiting to see how it will play out. The case has the potential to set a precedent for future cases involving similar issues.

Latest development

2:25-cv-09483 James T Lucanish et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

Motion · April 24, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Unknown issue
  • Filing fee
  • Court action
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
edit_note
Motion 3 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Reply (Motion related) ( 23

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
edit_note
Motion April 24, 2026

2:25-cv-09483 James T Lucanish et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 33 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.