2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz
Generic Text Only Entry
Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz is a civil case filed in the Central District of California. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-07579. The current summary is Generic Text Only Entry.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Plaintiffs
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ivan Van Buren, Justin Robertson and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-07579.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-07579 Ivan Van Buren and 2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, Justin Robertson v. Birkholz, was filed in the same court as Ivan Van Buren v. Birkholz.
This new case is likely to impact the existing case, as both involve the same defendant, B. The filing of this new case may lead to a change in the court's. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied Ivan Van Buren's motion in the case 2:25-cv-07579.
This means that the motion, which was likely a request for some form of relief or action, will not be granted. The denial of the motion is a significant development in the case.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A new case, Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz, was filed in the same court as Ivan Van Buren v. Birkholz. This new case is likely to impact the existing case, as both involve the same defendant, B. The filing of this new case may lead to a change in the court's schedule or priorities.
The court denied Ivan Van Buren's motion in the case 2:25-cv-07579. This means that the motion, which was likely a request for some form of relief or action, will not be granted. The denial of the motion is a significant development in the case.
Generic Text Only Entry
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.