civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Central District of California civil case Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz remains pending

25-cv-07579 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz is a civil case filed in the Central District of California. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-07579. The current summary is Generic Text Only Entry.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Ivan Van Buren
  • B. Birkholz
  • Central District of California
  • 25-cv-07579
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

2 Plaintiffs

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ivan Van Buren, Justin Robertson and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 days, 19 hours ago

Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-07579.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 2:25-cv-07579 Ivan Van Buren and 2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, Justin Robertson v. Birkholz, was filed in the same court as Ivan Van Buren v. Birkholz.

This new case is likely to impact the existing case, as both involve the same defendant, B. The filing of this new case may lead to a change in the court's. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied Ivan Van Buren's motion in the case 2:25-cv-07579.

This means that the motion, which was likely a request for some form of relief or action, will not be granted. The denial of the motion is a significant development in the case.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

2:25-cv-07786 Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz

A new case, Justin Robertson v. B. Birkholz, was filed in the same court as Ivan Van Buren v. Birkholz. This new case is likely to impact the existing case, as both involve the same defendant, B. The filing of this new case may lead to a change in the court's schedule or priorities.

info
Other May 4, 2026

2:25-cv-07579 Ivan Van Buren v. B. Birkholz

The court denied Ivan Van Buren's motion in the case 2:25-cv-07579. This means that the motion, which was likely a request for some form of relief or action, will not be granted. The denial of the motion is a significant development in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.